The Art Of Euclids Writing Essays - Foundations Of Geometry

The Art Of Euclid's Writing In Elements book one, Euclid incorporates stylistic devices in the process of proving a series of mathematical theories. One stylistic aspect of Euclid's writing is his use of common notions, such as the whole being greater than the part, and postulates, such as drawing a line from any point to any point. His early use of common notions and postulates do not merely help to prove the particular proposition, but is used in later propositions to persuade the reader of his proofs as well as to instill confidence in himself and the reader of the conclusions he arrives at in the propositions. Even before the actual propositions begin, Euclid lists the common notions and postulates of which he and the reader agree with. By doing this, Euclid and the reader have confidence in the proofs. In another way, the words ?common notions? and ?postulates? can be substituted by ?common sense? because it is ten points which everyone believes to be true. For example, the majority of the conclusions in proposition thirteen were arrived at using common notions. The last three steps in finally proving proposition thirteen were based on common notions. Since everyone agrees with the common notions, Euclid is confident that he is making a logical progression in proving that if a straight line set up on a straight line make angles, it will make either two right angles or angles equal to two right angles. Because of the general agreement of the postulates and the common notions, and by listing them in advance, Euclid is confident that he is correct when he makes assumptions based on them. In the same sense, the reader also holds the conclusions that Euclid arrives at to be true. Another possibility to Euclid's use of postulates and common notions is that he often uses postulates to set up a problem in terms in which he knows to be correct and then concludes the proposition with a common notion. Euclid is confident that if he can arrive at a common notion for the last step, he is able to prove the proposition using that particular common notion. An example of this is proposition two in which his first step in proving the proposition uses postulate one and by a logical progression arrives at common notion one in the end to prove the proposition. Another reason for Euclid's use of common notions and postulates is the desire to persuade the audience that he is correct when he uses common notions to prove postulates. For example, in proposition four, which states that if two triangles have the two sides equal to two sides respectively, and have the angles contained by the equal straight lines equal, they will also have the base equal to the base, the triangle will be equal to the triangle, and the remaining angles will be equal to the remaining angles respectively, namely those which the equal sides subtend, Euclid's last step refers to common notion four, which ultimately proves the proposition. Because Euclid knows the reader agrees with the common notions, he can easily persuade them when he stakes a claim in order to prove a proposition. Another example is proposition two, that places at a given point (as an extremity) a straight line equal to a given straight line, which is solely proven using postulates and common notions . In this case, Euclid can easily persuade the reader because every step of the proposition involved either a postulate or a common notion. Since the reader accepts all the postulates and common notions to be true, Euclid can easily persuade the reader when all a proposition contains is common notions and postulates. In another instance, Euclid uses both a postulate and a common notion to prove one of the steps of proposition fifteen which states that if two straight lines cut one another, they make the vertical angles equal to one another. By fulfilling the conditions of a postulate and a common notion, the proposition gives the reader no doubt that the proof will work. Euclid also uses a proposition proven by a common notion to prove a later proposition. For example, propositions four and ten are correlated in this

French Love Language - Vocabulary and Tips

French Love Language - Vocabulary and Tips French is the language of love using it with your beau  can be incredibly romantic. But to  avoid turning your  je  taime into a je suis embarrassà ©,  review these grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary tips before professing your love.   How To Say I Love You in French? Its rather simple, and a lot of people know that sentence: Je taime - I am in love with you. It sounds like je tem. If you were to say vous to the person you are in love with (weird, but not impossible), it would be: Je vous aime with a strong liaison in Z: je voo zem. The Verb Aimer :To Love and to be in Love This is tricky indeed. Aimer means to love and to be in love. So, what if you want to say you just like someone, not romantically? Then youd have to add an adverb. Je taime bien I like youJe taime beaucoup Im fond of you (still as a friend) Now, be careful! If you were to omit the adverb, and just say: je taime, youd be saying I am in love with you... This could mean a lot of trouble. We also use the verb aimer to say we like food, stuff... Here, no problem to use it without an adverb, the meaning is obvious (to a French person at least). Jaime la France. I like/love France. So its only when you use aimer with a person that you could be in trouble. Note that we use aimer without an adverb with immediate family and pets.   Jaime ma fille. I love my daughter.Il aime son chien. He loves his dog. How To Say To Be In Love in French ? The expression à ªtre en amour is used in Canadian French, but not in France. We say à ªtre amoureux / amoureuse de quelquun Elle est amoureuse de Pierre elle aime Pierre. She is in love with Pierre. When you need to make it very clear that you are talking about love and not just like, then youd need to use the full expression à ªtre amoureux/amoureuse de. Il est amoureux de sa cousine. He is in love with his cousin.

Managing Organisational Change Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Managing Organisational Change - Essay Example The benefits that the company was tagged to get from its customer value creation program were the fact that customers would have the opportunity to see the company deliver on their needs and so have an established morale to continue doing business with the company. The challenge with this model was found to be the need to upgrade the company’s human resource base to welcome the change at hand since the customer relationship management was going to be technology driven and all stakeholders needed to match up to this. On revenue creation, revenue management was identified as the most ideal strategy. This was found beneficial because it could help in raising immediate capital for the company especially during holiday season when tourism activities were higher. Revenue management was to involve the hiking of prices for specific services delivered to specific people within a specific timeframe. The challenge associated with this has to be the inconvenience of existing customers to adjust to this new management culture. Lastly, the company was admonished to go into merger as a long term strategy for its expansion model. By merger, a company in the tourism industry was to be identified and joined with the existing coaches company. Change is an integral part of our daily lives. In fact, it is will difficult to imagine life without change. Such need for change is professed in all human institutions and organizations. Once there is change in the systems and structures of running an organization, we say organizational change has taken place (McCarthy, 2001). But the fact that change is inevitable and necessary does not mean that change should just happen. Experts advise that organizational change â€Å"should be seen as a discrete and specialized work stream† (Wallace, 2007). This means that organizational change is not as crucial as the management of it – thus